Using statistics and other data, JC Punongbayan and Kevin Mandrilla aim to show how and why the death penalty is not needed, anti-poor, and precarious with our legal and judicial systems status quo.
Indeed, there’s a great deal of debate surrounding the pros and cons of the death penalty. But in this article we take on the issue by turning to statistics, empirical studies, and a review of the country’s past experience with the death penalty. Read more >
Author JC Punongbayan and Kevin Mandrilla
News Site Rappler
Date Published February 11, 2017
Article Link Why the death penalty is unnecessary, anti-poor, error-prone
You might also like
More from Curated Content
How Does Income Relate to Life Expectancy?
In this short video Professor Hans Rosling shows that people live longer in countries with a high GDP per capita. …
VERA FILES FACT SHEET: PDEA tally of Bicol’s drug-affected barangays spikes in the same month Duterte called Naga a shabu ‘hotbed’
The number of drug-affected barangays in the Bicol Region spiked 357 percent in just seven months this year, according to …
How one data-driven art and technology company is understanding cities with AI
Should New York have more than five boroughs? Are zip codes too large? As part of the Northeastern University Visualization Consortium‘s …
