In more recent elections, voters from the National Capitol Region, highly educated, and middle class choose senatorial candidates that belong to political dynasties.
While much has been written about the prevalence of dynasties in Philippine politics and about the reservation that political dynasties are unhealthy for a democratic society, not much has been written about the profile of voters who choose candidates who belong to political clans. (READ: How much of our country will we lose to political dynasties in 2016?)
In a recently published book chapter, we examined the profile of the Philippine electorate who tended to vote for dynastic senatorial candidates. We analyzed SWS exit poll data from the 2001, 2004, and 2010 elections as well as an SWS pre-election poll in 2007.
Exit polls reflect voter-respondents’ choices of candidates after they have cast their votes. Sample sizes for these datasets range from 9,000 to 52,000.
We accounted for senatorial candidates who were members of national dynasties: they are the spouse or children of former or incumbent president, vice president, or senator.
The proportion of dynastic candidates running for Senate increased over the 4 election years. Four out of 37 senatorial candidates were members of national dynasties in 2001, 6 out of 41 in 2004, 8 out of 33 in 2007, and 13 out of 51 in 2010.
The urban, highly educated, middle class clusters
On average, while voters in rural and urban areas roughly picked the same number of senatorial candidates belonging to political clans in 2001, more recent elections showed that voters in urban areas chose a higher number of dynastic candidates than voters in rural areas.
Chart 1. Average number of dynastic candidates voted by urban and rural residences
From 2001 to 2007, voters in the Visayas, on average, selected a higher number of senatorial candidates from political families. In 2010, however, selection of dynastic candidates was highest in the National Capitol Region than in any other area of the country.
Chart 2. Average number of dynastic candidates voted by area
Across the 4 election years, voters with some college education and beyond opted for more dynastic senatorial candidates, on average, than voters with elementary and high school educational attainment.
Chart 3. Average number of dynastic candidates voted by education
You might also like
More from News
India’s gender inequality has led to millions of ‘unwanted’ girls
This report from CNN uses data to highlight the widening gender gap in India. India's preference for sons over daughters has …
The history of 2017 in seven charts
Guardian US data editor Mona Chalabi summarizes the broader trends of 2017 through infographics. When we try to remember 2017 (or …
How They Did It: Enslaved Land Investigation
“Collaboration is a road worth exploring; as a journalist, you’d have to be asleep to not go down this path. …